Filmmaker Darryl Yap stirred fresh controversy online after criticizing actresses Pokwang and Pinky Amador for attending a recent gathering hosted by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr..
Photos circulating on social media showed the two actresses present at what was described as a social event organized by the President, also known as Bongbong Marcos. The images quickly drew mixed reactions from netizens, particularly from those who recalled the actresses’ previous political sentiments during the 2022 election period.
In a Facebook post, Yap openly expressed his surprise at seeing Pokwang and Amador at the event. Without naming specific statements from the past, the filmmaker alluded to what he described as an apparent contradiction between their earlier positions and their recent public appearance alongside the Chief Executive.
“Dati akala ko, malakas na ang loob ko, akala ko makapal ang mukha ko pero nung nakita ko ang pictures nila Pokwang at Pinky Amador sa paparty ni Bongbong Marcos, isa pala akong mahiyain,” Yap wrote, suggesting that he found the situation ironic.
The remark quickly went viral, reigniting conversations about political loyalty, public accountability, and the evolving relationships between celebrities and those in power. Some netizens echoed Yap’s sentiments, questioning what they perceived as a shift in stance. Others, however, defended the actresses, arguing that attending a presidential event does not necessarily equate to a political endorsement.
Neither Pokwang nor Amador has released an official statement addressing the online reactions as of this writing.
The incident underscores the continuing scrutiny faced by public figures in the Philippines, where political affiliations and past statements remain highly visible in the age of social media. For celebrities who previously expressed strong views during election season, public appearances — especially those involving high-profile political leaders — can quickly become flashpoints for debate.
As reactions continue to pour in, the episode highlights a broader conversation about political expression, reconciliation, and whether public figures are allowed to change positions — or whether the internet never forgets.
